Algorithmic fairness Explainability Recommender systems

Counterfactual Graph Augmentation for Consumer Unfairness Mitigation in Recommender Systems

It is possible to effectively address consumer unfairness in recommender systems by using counterfactual explanations to augment the user-item interaction graph. This approach not only leads to fairer outcomes across different demographic groups but also maintains or improves the overall utility of the recommendations. In a study with Francesco Fabbri, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras, and …

Continue Reading
Algorithmic fairness Recommender systems

Practical perspectives of consumer fairness in recommendation

The mitigation of consumer fairness assumes that recommendations bring equitable effectiveness for the different demographic groups of users. Mitigation approaches can be analyzed from, multiple, technical perspectives. Different mitigation strategies at the state of the art offer different properties. In a study, published by the Information Processing and Management journal (Elsevier) and conducted with Gianni …

Continue Reading
Algorithmic fairness User profiling

Do Graph Neural Networks Build Fair User Models? Assessing Disparate Impact and Mistreatment in Behavioural User Profiling

User profiling approaches that model the interaction between users and items (behavioral user profiling) via Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are unfair toward certain demographic groups. In a CIKM 2022 study, conducted with Erasmo Purificato and Ernesto William De Luca, we perform a beyond-accuracy analysis of the state-of-the-art approaches to assess the presence of disparate impact …

Continue Reading
Algorithmic fairness Recommender systems

Equality of Learning Opportunity via Individual Fairness in Personalized Recommendations

The formalization of the learning opportunities that should be offered by the recommendation of online courses can lead to defining what fairness means for a platform. A post-processing approach that balances personalization and equality of recommended opportunities can lead to effective and fair recommendations. In a study published by the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence …

Continue Reading
Algorithmic fairness Explainability Recommender systems

Post Processing Recommender Systems with Knowledge Graphs for Recency, Popularity, and Diversity of Explanations

Being able to assess explanation quality in recommender systems and by shaping recommendation lists that account for explanation quality allows us to produce more effective recommendations. These recommendations can also increase explanation quality according to the proposed properties, fairly across demographic groups. In a SIGIR 2022 paper, with Giacomo Balloccu, Gianni Fenu, and Mirko Marras, …

Continue Reading
Algorithmic fairness Recommender systems

Consumer Fairness in Recommender Systems: Contextualizing Definitions and Mitigations

Enabling non-discrimination for end-users of recommender systems by introducing consumer fairness is a key problem. Current research has led to a variety of notions, metrics, and unfairness mitigation procedures. Nevertheless, only around half of the published studies are reproducible. When comparing the existing approaches under the same protocol, we get unexpected outcomes, such as the …

Continue Reading
Algorithmic fairness Recommender systems

Enabling cross-continent provider fairness in educational recommender systems

The courses of teachers are under-recommended by state-of-the-art models, unless they belong to the country that offers more courses and attracts more ratings. Regulating how recommendations are distributed with respect to the country of provenience of the teachers enables equitable and effective recommendations (cross-continent provider fairness). In a paper published in the Future Generation Computing …

Continue Reading
Algorithmic fairness Recommender systems

Provider fairness across continents in collaborative recommender systems

In the presence of data imbalances, where some demographic groups of providers are represented more than others, the items of all the demographic groups that are not the majority group are under-recommended. A mitigation that accounts for the representation of each demographic group allows to introduce equity in the recommendation process, without having an impact …

Continue Reading